Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Michael DeRosa: Canucks: Quiet Deadline Day; Preview vs. Maple Leafs
Author Message
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Mar 8 @ 1:51 PM ET
Sounds like it still bothers you.
- Reubenkincade

As a Canucks 'fan', it should still bother you as well.

Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 1:54 PM ET
As a Canucks 'fan', it should still bother you as well.


- LordHumungous



Sound like Nighty, trying to tell people how to be a fan.
Shuswap Wap
Location: BC
Joined: 02.07.2018

Mar 8 @ 1:55 PM ET
Sound like Nighty, trying to tell people how to be a fan.
- Reubenkincade

You’re just not fanatic enough Reuby.
Danny Bomber
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.01.2017

Mar 8 @ 2:04 PM ET
You keep pretending that I’m pretending the Canucks are building a contender and I’ll keep laughing at you. Im discussing one trade, which given the circumstances, is a good trade for the team. I hope they’re more competitive next year as all this losing is getting tiresome.
- DraftandDestroy

I thought the Horvat trade was a good trade.
The Hronek trade, I'm not thrilled about. I thought they could wait until the summer to make that kind of trade. We'll have to wait and see how effective it ends up being. I would have rathered taking a chance on the picks. But that's me. The organization has a different plan and that is to retool for the 10th year in a row.
Anyway, as one of your personalties keeps harping on about, that won't change until the child-beating owner is gone.


Table 12 needs water re-fills.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Mar 8 @ 2:08 PM ET
As a Canucks 'fan', it should still bother you as well.


- LordHumungous

A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Mar 8 @ 2:08 PM ET
Sound like Nighty, trying to tell people how to be a fan.
- Reubenkincade

Jkuzzi
Joined: 12.14.2016

Mar 8 @ 2:29 PM ET
Canucks should trade for Lamar Jackson
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 2:35 PM ET
I really don't know what she goes on about, I skip over everything.

She's a female Thomas Drance wannabe.

- VanHockeyGuy


Boom
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 2:40 PM ET

Who has time to backread the archives to prove his point.

- K-man25


You would be surprised. When it comes to a d1ck measuring contest there is always time to backread
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 2:46 PM ET
Top 6? You're just as bad as Vantel.
- Load Management


I said top 6 when Jake and Loui were our top six and I was bang on. I also said if he moves down to third line that is fine, that would mean we now acquired better forwards. Again bang on.

I also said he had good speed, a surprising shot, good passer, great along the boards, would score 8 to 10 goals his first year and about 25 points. I don't know how much more accurate I could have been.

The Bobfather should have used me.

But twist it the way you and Hefty want, that's fine.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Mar 8 @ 2:49 PM ET
You would be surprised. When it comes to a d1ck measuring contest there is always time to backread

- VANTEL

Load Management
Season Ticket Holder
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Billings Spit, BC
Joined: 09.22.2019

Mar 8 @ 2:59 PM ET
I said top 6 when Jake and Loui were our top six and I was bang on. I also said if he moves down to third line that is fine, that would mean we now acquired better forwards. Again bang on.

I also said he had good speed, a surprising shot, good passer, great along the boards, would score 8 to 10 goals his first year and about 25 points. I don't know how much more accurate I could have been.

The Bobfather should have used me.

But twist it the way you and Hefty want, that's fine.

- VANTEL


Shall we have Mini hit the archives, because all I remember is that you were wrong and still are.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 3:08 PM ET
Shall we have Mini hit the archives, because all I remember is that you were wrong and still are.
- Load Management


You can hit the archives all you want; I know exactly what I said about the kid. I pointed out that he was better than the current roster and will become a good player and you guys took it that he will be the next OV.

But I do love the thinking of the fanbase. Everyone wants draft picks and trade this guy and that guy so we can get picks and then we want to trade our young drafted players after two years.

Podz is exactly what this team needs. I think he is one of the best at puck retrieval on the team next to Petey. In case you guys haven't figured out yet you need the puck to score. I know that is very obvious but some of you guys are not the sharpest pencil.

I see Tochett had him out in OT the other night and even on PP1 for a very little bit.

This kid will be good. Not great but good. Absolutely something the Canucks needed. I think find him a good center and him and Kravstov will soon be a fun line.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Mar 8 @ 3:14 PM ET
Shall we have Mini hit the archives, because all I remember is that you were wrong and still are.
- Load Management

I work for nobody.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Mar 8 @ 3:19 PM ET
You can hit the archives all you want; I know exactly what I said about the kid. I pointed out that he was better than the current roster and will become a good player and you guys took it that he will be the next OV.

But I do love the thinking of the fanbase. Everyone wants draft picks and trade this guy and that guy so we can get picks and then we want to trade our young drafted players after two years.

Podz is exactly what this team needs. I think he is one of the best at puck retrieval on the team next to Petey. In case you guys haven't figured out yet you need the puck to score. I know that is very obvious but some of you guys are not the sharpest pencil.

I see Tochett had him out in OT the other night and even on PP1 for a very little bit.

This kid will be good. Not great but good. Absolutely something the Canucks needed. I think find him a good center and him and Kravstov will soon be a fun line.

- VANTEL

PP units #Canucks
@Sportsnet650


🥅
Kuzmenko
Miller-Beauvillier-Pettersson
Hughes

🥅
Dries
Kravtsov-Boeser-Garland
Wolanin

(frank)en Garland.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 3:21 PM ET
PP units #Canucks
@Sportsnet650


🥅
Kuzmenko
Miller-Beauvillier-Pettersson
Hughes

🥅
Dries
Kravtsov-Boeser-Garland
Wolanin

(frank)en Garland.

- manvanfan


Brock in the middle. He needs a full two minutes to release.


I know I am probably the only one but I like Garland. I mostly see the puck in the other teams zone when he is on the ice and more scoring chances. Brock is the one that needs to go.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 3:26 PM ET
I said top 6 when Jake and Loui were our top six and I was bang on. I also said if he moves down to third line that is fine, that would mean we now acquired better forwards. Again bang on.

I also said he had good speed, a surprising shot, good passer, great along the boards, would score 8 to 10 goals his first year and about 25 points. I don't know how much more accurate I could have been.

The Bobfather should have used me.

But twist it the way you and Hefty want, that's fine.

- VANTEL


At that time, people were talking about Gaudette being the 2LC.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 3:29 PM ET
At that time, people were talking about Gaudette being the 2LC.
- Reubenkincade


There has been no shortage of people being wrong on here (myself included).
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Mar 8 @ 3:29 PM ET
Brock in the middle. He needs a full two minutes to release.


I know I am probably the only one but I like Garland. I mostly see the puck in the other teams zone when he is on the ice and more scoring chances. Brock is the one that needs to go.

- VANTEL

They both need to go. Garland plays good once every ten games, other than that he’s a 5’8” perimeter player, and Boeser just needs a change of scenery. He looks totally unmotivated and uninterested.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 3:36 PM ET
There has been no shortage of people being wrong on here (myself included).

- VANTEL





Although, no one is wrong more often than Lefty.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 3:38 PM ET


Although, no one is wrong more often than Lefty.

- Reubenkincade


That is just a known fact.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Mar 8 @ 3:40 PM ET
Brock in the middle. He needs a full two minutes to release.


I know I am probably the only one but I like Garland. I mostly see the puck in the other teams zone when he is on the ice and more scoring chances. Brock is the one that needs to go.

- VANTEL

They are pretty well equal. Much more happens at both ends of the ice with Boeser than Garland though.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Mar 8 @ 3:46 PM ET


Although, no one is wrong more often than Lefty.

- Reubenkincade

that’s a total lie just to make yourself feel better about your dumbass because I don’t follow prospects unless they’re top five, although I will throw out the occasional “he’s big and/or fast so take him”.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Mar 8 @ 3:53 PM ET
Pad your stats game tonight. Canucks should make it fair and play the 4th line the most, 3rd line 2nd most and so on.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 3:55 PM ET
that’s a total lie just to make yourself feel better about your dumbass because I don’t follow prospects unless they’re top five, although I will throw out the occasional “he’s big and/or fast so take him”.
- LeftCoaster


I was actually thinking about how long you argued about how there was no chance that Luongo would retire.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169  Next