Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Michael DeRosa: Canucks: Quiet Deadline Day; Preview vs. Maple Leafs
Author Message
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 6:50 PM ET
Don't know why some care about the Islanders pick. It is gone.
- VANTEL


I think he likes Bo, so understandable. Sometimes you need to have another team, when you are a Canucks, they don't seem to be a team that has had a good history.

I tell any new fans to run as fast as you can, find some other team to cheer for.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Mar 8 @ 6:50 PM ET
Not much aside from I set the record straight on you and Virtanen again.

- boonerbuck

What did you say? That I was wrong about Jake being a good player and one that the franchise needed? Because I was clearly wrong, he was a dud. But I’m cool with that.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Mar 8 @ 6:51 PM ET
Every year some very good teams lose in the first round because of the current format, nothing new that some good teams will go home early. Should be 1 vs 16.
- LeftCoaster

Every year only 1 team wins da mug
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Mar 8 @ 6:52 PM ET
Get new friends.

- VANTEL

-250 for the Canucks tonight but I still went full tilt and put $10 on them.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 6:53 PM ET
Every year some very good teams lose in the first round because of the current format, nothing new that some good teams will go home early. Should be 1 vs 16.
- LeftCoaster


At minimum 1v8 in conference. With unbalanced schedules, 1v16 isn't really a fair ranking system.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 6:54 PM ET
I think he likes Bo, so understandable. Sometimes you need to have another team, when you are a Canucks, they don't seem to be a team that has had a good history.

I tell any new fans to run as fast as you can, find some other team to cheer for.

- Reubenkincade


I don't always watch the playoffs. Some years yes, some no. I lose a lot of interest when my team goes. In fact after the playoffs is when real Canuck hockey happens. We get to go spend money foolishly.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 6:54 PM ET
If it was a balanced schedule.
- VANTEL


Yup.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Mar 8 @ 6:55 PM ET
-250 for the Canucks tonight but I still went full tilt and put $10 on them.
- LeftCoaster

Just for you…

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x3MamvKeOvg
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Mar 8 @ 6:57 PM ET
I don't always watch the playoffs. Some years yes, some no. I lose a lot of interest when my team goes. In fact after the playoffs is when real Canuck hockey happens. We get to go spend money foolishly.

- VANTEL

I had to move from Vancouver cuz no playoffs. Couldn’t find a tee time with them taking them all.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Mar 8 @ 6:57 PM ET
At minimum 1v8 in conference. With unbalanced schedules, 1v16 isn't really a fair ranking system.
- Reubenkincade

True, although I think they should change the schedules, 1 vs 8 is even much better. It’s a poor system as it’s setup imo. There’s no way #2 and #3 teams should be playing each other in round one.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 6:57 PM ET
-250 for the Canucks tonight but I still went full tilt and put $10 on them.
- LeftCoaster


I put 10 on them for over 6.5 goals and 10 on Chicago which is almost at 3.0 odds. Det has been sloppy and maybe tanking.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 6:57 PM ET
I don't always watch the playoffs. Some years yes, some no. I lose a lot of interest when my team goes. In fact after the playoffs is when real Canuck hockey happens. We get to go spend money foolishly.

- VANTEL





Funny, but true.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 6:57 PM ET
I had to move from Vancouver cuz no playoffs. Couldn’t find a tee time with them taking them all.
- Nighthawk

LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Mar 8 @ 6:58 PM ET
I put 10 on them for over 6.5 goals and 10 on Chicago which is almost at 3.0 odds. Det has been sloppy and maybe tanking.
- VANTEL

I put $12 on Chicago as well for the straight up win.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 6:58 PM ET
I put $12 on Chicago as well for the straight up win.
- LeftCoaster



I only put 10, I don't have a six figure diner to back up my finances.
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Mar 8 @ 7:02 PM ET
Don't know why some care about the Islanders pick. It is gone.
- VANTEL

I think most just want it to be in the 20's so we feel better about losing it.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Mar 8 @ 7:03 PM ET
True, although I think they should change the schedules, 1 vs 8 is even much better. It’s a poor system as it’s setup imo. There’s no way #2 and #3 teams should be playing each other in round one.
- LeftCoaster

I want a modified PO format. Makes more money & bottom teams run a gauntlet & best 3 teams each division get some rest & heal.

Top 3 each division get a bye.
Straight into the play down
4 WC teams each conference.
- play a home & home B2B nights
- decides who top conference team play
- 1st round then begins after 1 day rest
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Mar 8 @ 7:03 PM ET
What did you say? That I was wrong about Jake being a good player and one that the franchise needed? Because I was clearly wrong, he was a dud. But I’m cool with that.
- LeftCoaster


I just went over how you are downplaying what you said is all. Nothing that hasn't been established in the past already regardless of your rewrites...
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Mar 8 @ 7:03 PM ET
I think most just want it to be in the 20's so we feel better about losing it.
- Retinalz

Mostly this, yeah.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Mar 8 @ 7:04 PM ET
True, although I think they should change the schedules, 1 vs 8 is even much better. It’s a poor system as it’s setup imo. There’s no way #2 and #3 teams should be playing each other in round one.
- LeftCoaster



I agree, it has always been a bad system.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Mar 8 @ 7:04 PM ET
I just went over how you are downplaying what you said is all. Nothing that hasn't been established in the past already regardless of your rewrites...

- boonerbuck

I’m glad it makes you feel good inside that I was wrong about Jake.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 7:05 PM ET
If anyone is at the Jets game and sees a short guy with six hot dogs, a dozen donuts and Evian water bottle on his way tohis seat, yell out Hello Mini.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Mar 8 @ 7:05 PM ET


I only put 10, I don't have a six figure diner to back up my finances.

- VANTEL

You should’ve married up like I did.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Mar 8 @ 7:07 PM ET
I think most just want it to be in the 20's so we feel better about losing it.
- Retinalz


We didn't really lose it, we cashed it in. At first my initial reaction was what a dumb move and then I remembered I think Canucks suck at drafting.
Danny Bomber
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.01.2017

Mar 8 @ 7:07 PM ET
They were Ultras, not even real beer!
- LeftCoaster

Why admit something so embarrassing? Maybe you and Bloated can talk it out in his "Palm Bay Forum".
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169  Next