Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Jan Levine: Rangers acquire Alex Wennberg to be their 3C, what else might get done
Author Message
jimbro83
New York Rangers
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY
Joined: 12.25.2009

Mar 7 @ 3:04 PM ET

CapFriendly
@CapFriendly
·
49s
TRADE

To Colorado #GoAvsGo
F - Yakov Trenin
D - Graham Sward (Signing Rights)

To Nashville #Preds
D - Jeremy Hanzel (signed his ELC today)
2025 3rd RD pick (COL)
blacksheep1
New York Rangers
Location: Handsome Eddy, IA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:04 PM ET
CapFriendly
@CapFriendly
·
56s
TRADE

To Colorado #GoAvsGo
F - Yakov Trenin
D - Graham Sward (Signing Rights)

To Nashville #Preds
D - Jeremy Hanzel (signed his ELC today)
2025 3rd RD pick (COL)


Jimbo beat me.
blacksheep1
New York Rangers
Location: Handsome Eddy, IA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:05 PM ET
Do I wanna see a VGK/COL WCF? Yes I do.
Tonybere
New York Rangers
Location: ON
Joined: 02.04.2016

Mar 7 @ 3:07 PM ET
Lets say the Rangers do get Guentzel... I think they should still go after a RW like Duclair and make the line just straight firepower with Guentzel, Mika, Duclair.
- aecliptic


I think we all know where I stand on trades at this point, but do we really feel like Duclair makes us better, overall? I've never seen or read anything that makes me think he isn't still totally one-dimensional. Of all the trade targets mentioned, the only ones I'd be ok with are Buch or Toffoli. But ideally, I still just want to see our current roster gel.
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:07 PM ET
CapFriendly
@CapFriendly
·
49s
TRADE

To Colorado #GoAvsGo
F - Yakov Trenin
D - Graham Sward (Signing Rights)

To Nashville #Preds
D - Jeremy Hanzel (signed his ELC today)
2025 3rd RD pick (COL)

- jimbro83


Avs are picking up the nasty this deadline.
eichiefs9
New York Islanders
Location: NY
Joined: 11.03.2008

Mar 7 @ 3:08 PM ET
Well today should get fun

https://twitter.com/Golde...tatus/1765830858194489789
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:08 PM ET
I think we all know where I stand on trades at this point, but do we really feel like Duclair makes us better, overall? I've never seen or read anything that makes me think he isn't still totally one-dimensional. Of all the trade targets mentioned, the only ones I'd be ok with are Buch or Toffoli. But ideally, I still just want to see our current roster gel.
- Tonybere


He is totally one dimensional and thats all we need from him, however after they have traded most of their biggest assets for Guentzel, Duclair on the cheap could be a nice option for RW.
picklerick
New York Rangers
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 03.01.2018

Mar 7 @ 3:09 PM ET
Vegas twitter posted the side eyes emoji so they might’ve done something else
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:10 PM ET
Vegas twitter posted the side eyes emoji so they might’ve done something else
- picklerick


Put Alec Martinez on LTIR again?
TheMessiah94
New York Rangers
Location: NJ
Joined: 07.21.2007

Mar 7 @ 3:11 PM ET
Well today should get fun

https://twitter.com/Golde...tatus/1765830858194489789

- eichiefs9

Down Goes Brown
@DownGoesBrown
The scariest emoji in the entire NHL.

jimbro83
New York Rangers
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY
Joined: 12.25.2009

Mar 7 @ 3:12 PM ET
Vegas twitter posted the side eyes emoji so they might’ve done something else
- picklerick


yeah it wasnt hockey related
eichiefs9
New York Islanders
Location: NY
Joined: 11.03.2008

Mar 7 @ 3:12 PM ET
Down Goes Brown
@DownGoesBrown
The scariest emoji in the entire NHL.


- TheMessiah94

I hate when teams do it honestly. It's like a little kid going "I have a secret but I can't tell you"
eichiefs9
New York Islanders
Location: NY
Joined: 11.03.2008

Mar 7 @ 3:13 PM ET
yeah it wasnt hockey related
- jimbro83

Now I hate it even more
picklerick
New York Rangers
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 03.01.2018

Mar 7 @ 3:14 PM ET
yeah it wasnt hockey related
- jimbro83


(frank)ers
blacksheep1
New York Rangers
Location: Handsome Eddy, IA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:18 PM ET
Now I hate it even more
- eichiefs9

Tonybere
New York Rangers
Location: ON
Joined: 02.04.2016

Mar 7 @ 3:26 PM ET
He is totally one dimensional and thats all we need from him, however after they have traded most of their biggest assets for Guentzel, Duclair on the cheap could be a nice option for RW.
- aecliptic


The last thing we need is to become less team-defense oriented.
Remember the female doging around here as we went from the textbook 1-3-1 squad to not being able to stop an opponent from going wherever they pleased?
blacksheep1
New York Rangers
Location: Handsome Eddy, IA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:33 PM ET
I think we all know where I stand on trades at this point, but do we really feel like Duclair makes us better, overall? I've never seen or read anything that makes me think he isn't still totally one-dimensional. Of all the trade targets mentioned, the only ones I'd be ok with are Buch or Toffoli. But ideally, I still just want to see our current roster gel.
- Tonybere

He's provides some skill and speed. I'd take him. but that would after the exhausted other avenues.
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:34 PM ET
The last thing we need is to become less team-defense oriented.
Remember the female doging around here as we went from the textbook 1-3-1 squad to not being able to stop an opponent from going wherever they pleased?

- Tonybere


One player doesnt cripple an entire team. But like I said, its contingent on that line scoring, if that line doesnt score, then it makes it all moot. However, I think a line of Guentzel, Mika, Duclair should be able to score, score enough that the other team is on their heels when theyre out there and they dont end up having to play defense.
fourtrax23
New York Rangers
Joined: 12.17.2008

Mar 7 @ 3:35 PM ET
The last thing we need is to become less team-defense oriented.
Remember the female doging around here as we went from the textbook 1-3-1 squad to not being able to stop an opponent from going wherever they pleased?

- Tonybere


You typed this straight out of my mind. ^5


blacksheep1
New York Rangers
Location: Handsome Eddy, IA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:38 PM ET
somebody make a god dam trade.
Tonybere
New York Rangers
Location: ON
Joined: 02.04.2016

Mar 7 @ 3:39 PM ET
One player doesnt cripple an entire team. But like I said, its contingent on that line scoring, if that line doesnt score, then it makes it all moot. However, I think a line of Guentzel, Mika, Duclair should be able to score, score enough that the other team is on their heels when theyre out there and they dont end up having to play defense.
- aecliptic


Now we're getting Guentzel AND Duclair????? Not sure how that works.
Also, you're moving all-time Rangers great Kreider to the 3rd line for a one-dimensional player with fewer goals and an autograph book signed by 2/3's of the league's GMs?
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:45 PM ET
Now we're getting Guentzel AND Duclair????? Not sure how that works.
Also, you're moving all-time Rangers great Kreider to the 3rd line for a one-dimensional player with fewer goals and an autograph book signed by 2/3's of the league's GMs?

- Tonybere


As I said, Duclair probably wont be an expensive get and yes, were moving Kreider to the 3rd line so that we can play Guentzel on his strong side rather than forcing him to play on the RW which may or may not work out.

Lets say we trade for Guentzel and he doesnt pan out playing RW. What do you do? You gonna tell him, "hey, buck up, figure it out, we gave up a lot for you"? No. Youre gonna put him on the LW, be forced to move Kreider either to RW (which we know he doesnt like either because that experiment was already tried) or you leave Kreider on LW but move him to the 3rd line. But wait... whos gonna play RW...? Kakko's probably gone in a deal for Guentzel. Cuylle? Do you trust him yet? Vesey again? Maybe we should try Goodrow again on the 1st line? Atleast with Duclair you got a guy with a lot of speed who can score goals who CAN play RW.

If Mika has decided he wants to be a passer, then surround him with shooters.
blacksheep1
New York Rangers
Location: Handsome Eddy, IA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:47 PM ET
As I said, Duclair probably wont be an expensive get and yes, were moving Kreider to the 3rd line so that we can play Guentzel on his strong side rather than forcing him to play on the RW which may or may not work out.

Lets say we trade for Guentzel and he doesnt pan out playing RW. What do you do? You gonna tell him, "hey, buck up, figure it out, we gave up a lot for you"? No. Youre gonna put him on the LW, be forced to move Kreider either to RW (which we know he doesnt like either because that experiment was already tried) or you leave Kreider on LW but move him to the 3rd line. But wait... whos gonna play RW...? Kakko's probably gone in a deal for Guentzel. Cuylle? Do you trust him yet? Vesey again? Maybe we should try Goodrow again on the 1st line? Atleast with Duclair you got a guy with a lot of speed who can score goals who CAN play RW.

- aecliptic

Why don't the Rangers get a RW instead of another LW?
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Mar 7 @ 3:48 PM ET
Why don't the Rangers get a RW instead of another LW?
- blacksheep1


Because Im not Chris Drury and right now all the rumors are surrounding Guentzel so thats what we got to work with for now until something else comes out to change that.
TheMessiah94
New York Rangers
Location: NJ
Joined: 07.21.2007

Mar 7 @ 3:50 PM ET
As I said, Duclair probably wont be an expensive get and yes, were moving Kreider to the 3rd line so that we can play Guentzel on his strong side rather than forcing him to play on the RW which may or may not work out.

Lets say we trade for Guentzel and he doesnt pan out playing RW. What do you do? You gonna tell him, "hey, buck up, figure it out, we gave up a lot for you"? No. Youre gonna put him on the LW, be forced to move Kreider either to RW (which we know he doesnt like either because that experiment was already tried) or you leave Kreider on LW but move him to the 3rd line. But wait... whos gonna play RW...? Kakko's probably gone in a deal for Guentzel. Cuylle? Do you trust him yet? Vesey again? Maybe we should try Goodrow again on the 1st line? Atleast with Duclair you got a guy with a lot of speed who can score goals who CAN play RW.

If Mika has decided he wants to be a passer, then surround him with shooters.

- aecliptic

That's why you trade for Captain Happy and call it a day.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30  Next