Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Trevor Neufeld: Canucks-Red Wings Game Day — Potential Top 10 Pick Zach Benson — Wrinkles
Author Message
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Feb 22 @ 2:08 PM ET
Just shows you players want to win. JTM and Kuz got possession with seconds to go and just found a way. It was a beauty of a goal.

We know points hurt the tank. But good to see the way they play at this point has more effort. With the current D they will keep losing and tank to around 5-8 odds at the lotto it seems.

- Quinn's Quest

I feel like we could finish as good as 4th best odds with at worst 8th best.
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 22 @ 2:14 PM ET
This is all just Brock’s agent trying to manufacture something that isn’t there. They know Brock sucks and they are also in cap hell
- CanuckDon


Truth to this, VAN's not going to eat a large portion of his salary, there would be no point in moving him.
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Feb 22 @ 2:15 PM ET
I feel like we could finish as good as 4th best odds with at worst 8th best.
- Retinalz


Going to be more difficult post-TDL if Canucks don't ship out some players... teams around them are going to sell and get worse – St Lou already on that path
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 22 @ 2:22 PM ET
Elliotte said one team that was interested was offering a mid 3rd rounder for Schenn but they thought their offer was going to get beat.

(Marek Show)
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 22 @ 2:32 PM ET
The question is do we take him at say 5, or hope he is there at 13-16?
- Retinalz

Not at 5, no but if they pick at around 8-9 i think you have to consider it. Otherwise pick him or Sandin-Pellika where the isles are. Top5 pick has too much value to be the elite skill player we also need imo.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Feb 22 @ 2:33 PM ET
Brisebois and Raty recalled, DiGiuseppe sent down
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 22 @ 2:43 PM ET
I feel like we could finish as good as 4th best odds with at worst 8th best.
- Retinalz


Going to be interesting how Demko plays down the stretch, might be disappointing to some tank enthusiasts
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 22 @ 2:58 PM ET
Kinda disappointing after getting what was it a 4th for Motte? Ottawa gets Gauthier. Bottom 6 guy but lots of potential to be an effective one.
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Feb 22 @ 3:02 PM ET
Kinda disappointing after getting what was it a 4th for Motte? Ottawa gets Gauthier. Bottom 6 guy but lots of potential to be an effective one.
- neem55

Gauthier sucks. We got a far better return for Motte
SMP8719
Vancouver Canucks
Location: ALDY , BC
Joined: 02.24.2012

Feb 22 @ 3:02 PM ET
Going to be interesting how Demko plays down the stretch, might be disappointing to some tank enthusiasts
- neem55


kinda lose lose...plays well hurts the tank..... plays like he has loses most of his value.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 22 @ 3:04 PM ET
kinda lose lose...plays well hurts the tank..... plays like he has loses most of his value.
- SMP8719

I'm hoping he finds his game with like 12 games or so left and goes on a burner to finish out.
SMP8719
Vancouver Canucks
Location: ALDY , BC
Joined: 02.24.2012

Feb 22 @ 3:10 PM ET
I'm hoping he finds his game with like 12 games or so left and goes on a burner to finish out.
- neem55


Sounds like a Canucks move.... make sure we rise up a few spots for a worse pic after already being eliminated. Could def see it happening.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 22 @ 3:10 PM ET
Unless Canucks are top 3, you take Reinbacher, if available.
- Reubenkincade


Disagree.

You don't pass on a top C prospect to grad a Dman despite our current need for one. We have other picks to address this need. In 5 years we're going to need a centre as well.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 22 @ 3:11 PM ET
I'm hoping he finds his game with like 12 games or so left and goes on a burner to finish out.
- neem55


I'm hoping he finds his game right away and gets moved for a boatlaod at the deadline.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 22 @ 3:12 PM ET
Disagree.

You don't pass on a top C prospect to grad a Dman despite our current need for one. We have other picks to address this need. In 5 years we're going to need a centre as well.

- golfingsince

You don't reach for anything, we need it all! I do want d picks but in the top 5 makes no sense IMO
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 22 @ 3:12 PM ET
Disagree.

You don't pass on a top C prospect to grad a Dman despite our current need for one. We have other picks to address this need. In 5 years we're going to need a centre as well.

- golfingsince


I'm pretty confident the Canucks take a C with their own pick.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 22 @ 3:17 PM ET
You don't reach for anything, we need it all! I do want d picks but in the top 5 makes no sense IMO
- neem55

I'll reach to choose a C/D over a winger, especially if the wing talent is undersized.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 22 @ 3:18 PM ET
I'll reach to choose a C/D over a winger, especially if the wing talent is undersized.
- golfingsince

We need another elite forward, period. There's a few and some are center and some aren't. You always take special talent if you can, foolish not to imo.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 22 @ 3:19 PM ET
I'm pretty confident the Canucks take a C with their own pick.
- boonerbuck

Probably half the reason for moving Bo.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 22 @ 3:34 PM ET
We need another elite forward, period. There's a few and some are center and some aren't. You always take special talent if you can, foolish not to imo.
- neem55


I was talking in general. You reach for the premium positions.
CaptEO
Commissioner
Joined: 09.15.2005

Feb 22 @ 3:38 PM ET
Greetings. I bring tidings of great joy. We have a new VAN writer. Filling Carol's shoes was tough but I think you'll like this new writer.

Be on the look out for Michael's first piece soon.

EO
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 22 @ 3:39 PM ET
I was talking in general. You reach for the premium positions.
- golfingsince

Ya, which I disagree with. Elite talent is the real premium in the NHL, Canucks need more of it. They definitely need both a 2C and three dmen too, don't get me wrong. There's lots of room to grow on this team, I'm hoping they get a little of each and have at least another second rounder to do so. A dream scenario would be a couple dmen drafted in the first two rounds as well as some center/forwards with elite upside.

This convo about the top5 sums it up well for me, actually. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ1RJUthZjg
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 22 @ 3:47 PM ET
Greetings. I bring tidings of great joy. We have a new VAN writer. Filling Carol's shoes was tough but I think you'll like this new writer.

Be on the look out for Michael's first piece soon.

EO

- CaptEO



Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Feb 22 @ 3:50 PM ET
Greetings. I bring tidings of great joy. We have a new VAN writer. Filling Carol's shoes was tough but I think you'll like this new writer.

Be on the look out for Michael's first piece soon.

EO

- CaptEO



Excellent news.

Any chance you can get us the 1st overall pick?
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Feb 22 @ 3:55 PM ET

- boonerbuck


That guy is the only commenter with a start date before you, at least the only one I have seen.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92  Next