|
|
I just peed a little - VANTEL
Depends |
|
Fidel
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Twitter Joined: 08.11.2006
|
|
|
There is no chance that happens. Zero. Why the (frank) would they retain for 7 years lol. This isn’t OEL - CanuckDon
True |
|
|
|
I think it’s Boeser. Miller is going nowhere. Pens don’t have the assets. - Nighthawk
I will say Pickering this years first, Jarry and Petry for Demko and Miller.
|
|
Bakwas
Season Ticket Holder Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.22.2012
|
|
|
|
|
I will say Pickering this years first, Jarry and Petry for Demko and Miller. - VANTEL
Losing Demko would be tough, but acquiring Pickering and a 1st would be awesome. |
|
|
|
|
|
Depends - I-own_da-Northwest
|
|
Fidel
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Twitter Joined: 08.11.2006
|
|
|
Losing Demko would be tough, but acquiring Pickering and a 1st would be awesome. - I-own_da-Northwest
Why trade bubble demko? |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
In a bad way. - VanHockeyGuy
Allvin's been too good eh. |
|
|
|
Why trade bubble demko? - Fidel
Bubble Demko left the building and gave us his evil twin Bumble Demko.
|
|
|
|
Bubble Demko left the building and gave us his evil twin Bumble Demko. - VANTEL
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Wouldn’t mind that.
There’s a rumour that just started floating that it’s Boston’s first(that Toronto just acquired) and Kerfoot for Schenn. Gives Toronto the cap space to get murray back into the lineup and gives them Schenn as a #6/7 for the playoffs. - I-own_da-Northwest
No favours taking on Kerfoot cap. Needs a sweetener. |
|
Fidel
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Twitter Joined: 08.11.2006
|
|
|
Bubble Demko left the building and gave us his evil twin Bumble Demko. - VANTEL
LOL |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Why trade bubble demko? - Fidel
It's been a decade since Canucks had a decent starter. What's another decade. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
I just peed a little - VANTEL
good thing they have you wearing diapers now.
|
|
|
|
No favours taking on Kerfoot cap. Needs a sweetener. - Nighthawk
Would that Boston first be a sweetener up from a 3rd or possible 2nd rumoured for Schenn? Or what are you thinking? |
|
Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Hopefully both. - Load Management
|
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
It's been a decade since Canucks had a decent starter. What's another decade. - manvanfan
Boeser & Schenn by the TDL is a win. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I will say Pickering this years first, Jarry and Petry for Demko and Miller. - VANTEL
Taking on Petry? No ty |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
No favours taking on Kerfoot cap. Needs a sweetener. - Nighthawk
That's the 1st.
|
|
|
|
Taking on Petry? No ty - Nighthawk
Two years.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Would that Boston first be a sweetener up from a 3rd or possible 2nd rumoured for Schenn? Or what are you thinking? - I-own_da-Northwest
Tronna going to make a big D splash. Parayko for RHD my guess. |
|
Fidel
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Twitter Joined: 08.11.2006
|
|
|
Boeser & Schenn by the TDL is a win. - VanHockeyGuy
IMO Only Boeser would be a win. |
|
|
|
Tronna going to make a big D splash. Parayko for RHD my guess. - Nighthawk
That would be crazy. I think their management has to go all in. They have an unfavourable path of Tampa and then Boston. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Two years. - VANTEL
Only 1 part of that offer I didn’t like. |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 Next |