Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: York Newbury: Canucks Offseason Notes I
Author Message
Shuswap Wap
Location: BC
Joined: 02.07.2018

Jun 4 @ 11:55 AM ET
We just haven't got the right bait yet.
- DariusKnight

#trollingforBooner
Shuswap Wap
Location: BC
Joined: 02.07.2018

Jun 4 @ 11:57 AM ET
I highly doubt he's signing here as well, plus someone is gonna overpay as he's the best pure center on the market.

Hope Vancouver stays away and gets a top line winger instead

- NewYorkNuck

Debrusk?
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Jun 4 @ 12:07 PM ET
Debrusk?
- Shuswap Wap


Trading Hronek for a winger is ridiculous. That includes Necas.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Jun 4 @ 12:14 PM ET
Trading Hronek for a winger is ridiculous. That includes Necas.
- VanHockeyGuy

Unfortunately if he really wants 8 mil, any trade where we get back more than we traded is on the table imo.
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Jun 4 @ 12:19 PM ET
Trading Hronek for a winger is ridiculous. That includes Necas.
- VanHockeyGuy


Not necessarily. If they can trade him AND sign a top 4 defenseman to replace him, it's not a bad maneuver – especially if he's asking for 8+.
Jkuzzi
Joined: 12.14.2016

Jun 4 @ 12:56 PM ET
Not necessarily. If they can trade him AND sign a top 4 defenseman to replace him, it's not a bad maneuver – especially if he's asking for 8+.
- NewYorkNuck


This but Hronek definitely brings value and we know what we have in him. To me that is ideal but if we wiff on the dman ouch
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Jun 4 @ 1:13 PM ET
Trading Hronek for a winger is ridiculous. That includes Necas.
- VanHockeyGuy



DariusKnight
Vancouver Canucks
Location: "The Alien has landed in Vancouver!"
Joined: 03.09.2006

Jun 4 @ 1:17 PM ET
Not necessarily. If they can trade him AND sign a top 4 defenseman to replace him, it's not a bad maneuver – especially if he's asking for 8+.
- NewYorkNuck


He's an RFA, we don't need to sign him, we can always let him hold out like Hughes and Petey did when they signed their last contracts with Benning before this. If we make it clear to him that we will not being signing him and that he can sit at home unless he brings his demands into a range we can afford. And besides, if some team wants to give him an offer sheet at the price he wants, we can let him go and collect all the tasty 1sts we'll get for him.

Honestly, I'd rather sign for a top 6 winger than trade for one. You draft centers and defensemen as you can always convert a center to being a winger easy, it's hard to convert a winger to be a centerman and defensemen are ALWAYS at a premium.
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jun 4 @ 1:22 PM ET

- Reubenkincade

Yup.
Quinn's Quest
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 08.08.2022

Jun 4 @ 2:23 PM ET
He's an RFA, we don't need to sign him, we can always let him hold out like Hughes and Petey did when they signed their last contracts with Benning before this. If we make it clear to him that we will not being signing him and that he can sit at home unless he brings his demands into a range we can afford. And besides, if some team wants to give him an offer sheet at the price he wants, we can let him go and collect all the tasty 1sts we'll get for him.

Honestly, I'd rather sign for a top 6 winger than trade for one. You draft centers and defensemen as you can always convert a center to being a winger easy, it's hard to convert a winger to be a centerman and defensemen are ALWAYS at a premium.

- DariusKnight


No can do in your suggestions. Hronek has arb rights so he’s getting a contract and if Canucks don’t accept then he’s a UFA.

Canucks will either sign him or trade him at draft.
K-man25
Calgary Flames
Location: K town
Joined: 09.02.2014

Jun 4 @ 2:35 PM ET
Any fishing news?
Recipes?
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Jun 4 @ 2:38 PM ET
He's an RFA, we don't need to sign him, we can always let him hold out like Hughes and Petey did when they signed their last contracts with Benning before this. If we make it clear to him that we will not being signing him and that he can sit at home unless he brings his demands into a range we can afford. And besides, if some team wants to give him an offer sheet at the price he wants, we can let him go and collect all the tasty 1sts we'll get for him.

Honestly, I'd rather sign for a top 6 winger than trade for one. You draft centers and defensemen as you can always convert a center to being a winger easy, it's hard to convert a winger to be a centerman and defensemen are ALWAYS at a premium.

- DariusKnight


As Quinn said, he had arb rights, so it's either sign him long term, sign him to a 1 year deal through arb (very unlikely), or trade him.

I mean I don't care if they end up trading him for a winger or center or defenseman or picks. If Allvin and co feel he's asking too much relative to his worth and they can maneuver the situation to make the team better, they've earned that trust from me. I think they have a lot of different possibilities that we don't see
DariusKnight
Vancouver Canucks
Location: "The Alien has landed in Vancouver!"
Joined: 03.09.2006

Jun 4 @ 2:58 PM ET
As Quinn said, he had arb rights, so it's either sign him long term, sign him to a 1 year deal through arb (very unlikely), or trade him.

I mean I don't care if they end up trading him for a winger or center or defenseman or picks. If Allvin and co feel he's asking too much relative to his worth and they can maneuver the situation to make the team better, they've earned that trust from me. I think they have a lot of different possibilities that we don't see

- NewYorkNuck


I think they sign him at least for another year, trading him right now would send a bad message especially when he helped Hughes get to another level and (tentatively) win the Norris this year. They might not sign him long term, but I think they wait until next TDL to either fully commit or trade him. Is he the best defenseman they can get either on the trade market or UFA? I don't know, but moving on from him when they gave up so much for him (seeing as he's literally become the centerpiece of the Horvat trade) I don't see happening.

He may have priced himself out, but I don't think they'll get rid of him unless there's a trade out there that significantly improves them and they have a replacement in place to take over for him. Don't forget that they may not be able to resign Z or Myers and/or have to replace those minutes/players too. Doing that while trading Hronek away might drop us down significantly as our D was one of our biggest strengths this year, especially when both Demko and DeSmith went down to injuries and we had to turn to Superstar Silovs in the playoffs.
Quinn's Quest
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 08.08.2022

Jun 4 @ 3:07 PM ET
Yeo and Baumer join Green on Sens. Ex Canuck coaching staff complete. The Sens player trade values are going to plummet. Good pick ups by TDL lol.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 4 @ 3:42 PM ET
Maybe now Petey for Stutzle
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Jun 4 @ 3:43 PM ET
I think they sign him at least for another year, trading him right now would send a bad message especially when he helped Hughes get to another level and (tentatively) win the Norris this year. They might not sign him long term, but I think they wait until next TDL to either fully commit or trade him. Is he the best defenseman they can get either on the trade market or UFA? I don't know, but moving on from him when they gave up so much for him (seeing as he's literally become the centerpiece of the Horvat trade) I don't see happening.

He may have priced himself out, but I don't think they'll get rid of him unless there's a trade out there that significantly improves them and they have a replacement in place to take over for him. Don't forget that they may not be able to resign Z or Myers and/or have to replace those minutes/players too. Doing that while trading Hronek away might drop us down significantly as our D was one of our biggest strengths this year, especially when both Demko and DeSmith went down to injuries and we had to turn to Superstar Silovs in the playoffs.

- DariusKnight


If they sign him for a year his value drops tremendously. They're either forced to sign him when he has all the power, or trade him before he walks as a UFA. He just becomes a rental at that point for another team. They either have to sign him long term or trade him now.

I think too many teams/fan bases care too much about a bad message. Look at Vegas. They're ruthless, and players still sign there. They win.

Him helping Hughes also increases his trade value, so ya they gave up a lot for him but his value is higher now than when we traded for him... the contract detracts from that, so at worst it's even.

This management team is able to think of multiple things at one time, so I would highly doubt they would trade him without other things already lined up. Lots of time to sign their guys and then trade Hronek. There are good RHD UFAs on the market (Pesce being my ideal target), so it's not a complete swing in the dark this year.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 4 @ 4:19 PM ET
I know you guys don't want to hear it but quick temporary fix would be Ristolainen less 1.5 mil and Flyers second round pick for the rights to Jett Woo. His salary would be 3.6 mil for three years. He is pretty much the same type player as Myers was at the start of last year. Much cheaper than a six mil RHD.

I would also look at Bahl for Hoglander.
TurdFergeson
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: On the road again
Joined: 01.04.2021

Jun 4 @ 4:21 PM ET
I know you guys don't want to hear it but quick temporary fix would be Ristolainen less 1.5 mil and Flyers second round pick for the rights to Jett Woo. His salary would be 3.6 mil for three years. He is pretty much the same type player as Myers was at the start of last year. Much cheaper than a six mil RHD.

I would also look at Bahl for Hoglander.

- VANTEL

NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Jun 4 @ 4:24 PM ET
I know you guys don't want to hear it but quick temporary fix would be Ristolainen less 1.5 mil and Flyers second round pick for the rights to Jett Woo. His salary would be 3.6 mil for three years. He is pretty much the same type player as Myers was at the start of last year. Much cheaper than a six mil RHD.

I would also look at Bahl for Hoglander.

- VANTEL

No he isn't. Myers was overpaid and playing like a bottom pairing guy. Risto is statistically the worst defenseman in the entire league and actively a big detriment to his team
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Jun 4 @ 4:41 PM ET
Also a fair argument, it did not seem like he was keen on Vancouver.
- NorthNuck

I spoke to one of his buddies. He isn’t coming back
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Jun 4 @ 6:08 PM ET
As Quinn said, he had arb rights, so it's either sign him long term, sign him to a 1 year deal through arb (very unlikely), or trade him.

I mean I don't care if they end up trading him for a winger or center or defenseman or picks. If Allvin and co feel he's asking too much relative to his worth and they can maneuver the situation to make the team better, they've earned that trust from me. I think they have a lot of different possibilities that we don't see

- NewYorkNuck



I still bet that Canucks resign Hronek.
Hopefully longer term for a decent amount and without a NTC.

I’d like to see Hronek anchor a 2nd line with the right partner.

dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Jun 4 @ 6:11 PM ET
I spoke to one of his buddies. He isn’t coming back
- CanuckDon


Safe bet.
Lindholm and Joshua are moving in for greener pastures.
Need to sign Zadorov, resign Hronek and Myers.
Do some bargain bin hunting for cheaper wingers.
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jun 4 @ 6:11 PM ET
I still bet that Canucks resign Hronek.
Hopefully longer term for a decent amount and without a NTC.

I’d like to see Hronek anchor a 2nd line with the right partner.

- dbot

I'd rather keep Zadorov. They won't be keeping both.
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Jun 4 @ 6:20 PM ET
Safe bet.
Lindholm and Joshua are moving in for greener pastures.
Need to sign Zadorov, resign Hronek and Myers.
Do some bargain bin hunting for cheaper wingers.

- dbot

Need a top 6 Fwd to play with Petey
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Jun 4 @ 6:26 PM ET
I'd rather keep Zadorov. They won't be keeping both.
- Marwood


Disagree on that one.
I think they can easily bring back all 3.
Hronek will get paid. Hopefully under 7.
Zadorov hopefully under 5.
Myers under 3.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24  Next