|
|
I wish.
Busy indoctrinating the youth with woke politics today. - dbot
|
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
Trade Hronek
Re-sign Zadorov - Reubenkincade
Need someone to play top pairing minutes, I like Zadorov but he isn't that. I'm fine with Shipping Hronek, but they need someone who can defend on that level to replace him. |
|
|
|
Trade Hronek
Re-sign Zadorov - Reubenkincade
Sign Lindholm also we need a true second line center.
|
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
Sign Lindholm also we need a true second line center. - VANTEL
Signing Lindholm would give us 3 top line Cs |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Sign Lindholm also we need a true second line center. - VANTEL
Gives them nice options up the middle.
|
|
|
|
Gives them nice options up the middle. - VanHockeyGuy
Sets up trade potential also.
|
|
|
|
Sets up trade potential also.
- VANTEL
I like Hronek but not with his a$k. I think Ottawa is a great trade partner. They are desperate for change. |
|
|
|
I like Hronek but not with his a$k. I think Ottawa is a great trade partner. They are desperate for change. - Shuswap Wap
I thought Hronek was just okay. I think they overpaid and the return will not be close to what we paid. The feel i get from two different sites are Canucks can keep him other fan bases don't want to pay is price.
His first half when the Canucks firing on all cylinders he put up points, I think he owes Hughes a big share of his new contract. To me he is just a five mil player and like most RHD he will get a big fat raise that he does not deserve.
I think he will be a NYR |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Signing Lindholm would give us 3 top line Cs - NorthNuck
No it would not. Neither Swede is a top line Center |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
I thought Hronek was just okay. I think they overpaid and the return will not be close to what we paid. The feel i get from two different sites are Canucks can keep him other fan bases don't want to pay is price.
His first half when the Canucks firing on all cylinders he put up points, I think he owes Hughes a big share of his new contract. To me he is just a five mil player and like most RHD he will get a big fat raise that he does not deserve.
I think he will be a NYR - VANTEL
Hughes owes Hronek a lot for the Norris |
|
|
|
Hughes owes Hronek a lot for the Norris - CanuckDon
We are on opposite sides on the Hronek takes. Its all good.
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
We are on opposite sides on the Hronek takes. Its all good. - VANTEL
👍🏻
I just think he was really injured. He didn’t take a hard shot for 4 months. I don’t care much either way but I’m not sure how they find a replacement |
|
|
|
👍🏻
I just think he was really injured. He didn’t take a hard shot for 4 months. I don’t care much either way but I’m not sure how they find a replacement - CanuckDon
I just seen an interesting name tossed around. DeMelo.
I don't think Canucks are going to fully replace the UFAs that will walk but at least get close.
The trade proposal the guy made was Hronek for Ehlers and sign Dillon and Demelo for two years each. Both reliable Dmen. I did mention also Forbort before, a tough cheap bottom pair.
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
I just seen an interesting name tossed around. DeMelo.
I don't think Canucks are going to fully replace the UFAs that will walk but at least get close.
The trade proposal the guy made was Hronek for Ehlers and sign Dillon and Demelo for two years each. Both reliable Dmen. I did mention also Forbort before, a tough cheap bottom pair. - VANTEL
I’d be fine with Dillion or Demelo but they aren’t capable of replacing Hronek. Ehlers is pretty bad and he only has one more year before an undeserved raise 🤮. Also, no (frank)ing way that Hronek signs in WPG |
|
|
|
Finished tending the sheep for the day? - VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
|
I’d be fine with Dillion or Demelo but they aren’t capable of replacing Hronek. Ehlers is pretty bad and he only has one more year before an undeserved raise 🤮. Also, no (frank)ing way that Hronek signs in WPG - CanuckDon
That was the part that I said that ain't happening
Like I said we will not be able to match the loss of players that walk but stay close on the return. I don't think the return is going to be huge for Hronek. My offer would be something like.
SJ: Hronek and the rights to Woo.
Van: Pitts first, Zadina, Benning and Mukhamadullin |
|
|
|
I thought Hronek was just okay. I think they overpaid and the return will not be close to what we paid. The feel i get from two different sites are Canucks can keep him other fan bases don't want to pay is price.
His first half when the Canucks firing on all cylinders he put up points, I think he owes Hughes a big share of his new contract. To me he is just a five mil player and like most RHD he will get a big fat raise that he does not deserve.
I think he will be a NYR - VANTEL
Decent RHD’s are like unicorns. That being said, they better not trade Willander. |
|
|
|
Decent RHD’s are like unicorns. That being said, they better not trade Willander. - Shuswap Wap
They won't
|
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Location: K town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
I just seen an interesting name tossed around. DeMelo.
I don't think Canucks are going to fully replace the UFAs that will walk but at least get close.
The trade proposal the guy made was Hronek for Ehlers and sign Dillon and Demelo for two years each. Both reliable Dmen. I did mention also Forbort before, a tough cheap bottom pair. - VANTEL
If the Canucks have any hope of repeating their new found success, I’d suggest getting as many former Flames as they can.
Vancouver Flames! |
|
|
|
If the Canucks have any hope of repeating their new found success, I’d suggest getting as many former Flames as they can.
Vancouver Flames! - K-man25
Every two years you need to flush your team down the sh1tter. We have one more year left.
|
|
|
|
We are on opposite sides on the Hronek takes. Its all good. - VANTEL
Hronek for Chycrun and Pinto |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
I just seen an interesting name tossed around. DeMelo.
I don't think Canucks are going to fully replace the UFAs that will walk but at least get close.
The trade proposal the guy made was Hronek for Ehlers and sign Dillon and Demelo for two years each. Both reliable Dmen. I did mention also Forbort before, a tough cheap bottom pair. - VANTEL
None of the guys you’ve mentioned can play top pair. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Hronek for Chycrun and Pinto - Jkuzzi
I have interest in Pinto but certainly none in Chyrcrun (or however you spell his name). It’s bizarre how much this guy is overrated due to a good season on a trash team. He hasn’t done Jack in Ottawa |
|
|
|
Hronek is just gonna stay. They'll figure it out. Young rh d that can play 22 mins a night don't grow on trees |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
I have interest in Pinto but certainly none in Chyrcrun (or however you spell his name). It’s bizarre how much this guy is overrated due to a good season on a trash team. He hasn’t done Jack in Ottawa - CanuckDon
|
|