My brother always said that it is hard to find a serious relationship if you work in a government agency - the schedule is unstable, and the circle of contacts is limited. But then he registered on a dating site https://www.uniformdating.com/local-dating.html for government employees. And now, six months later, he is preparing for the wedding! He says that he has finally met a girl who understands his lifestyle. Now I think I'll give it a try.
- tironmings12
Haha, your brother’s story is wild—going from "government life’s a relationship killer" to wedding bells via UniformDating? That’s some next-level niche matchmaking! But let’s be real: posting this on a hockey forum is like trying to sell ice skates in the Sahara. The demographic crossover between puck-chasing, body-check-loving hockey fanatics and buttoned-up federal employees is so slim it’s practically a statistical anomaly.
Using a bit of set theory for kicks, let’s break it down: the population of hockey fans (call it set H) is already a subset of sports enthusiasts, skewed toward high-energy, physicality-driven types. Now, federal employees (set F)—we’re talking structured, often desk-bound folks with security clearances and rigid schedules. The intersection H ∩ F? That’s a Venn diagram with barely a sliver of overlap. Factor in the UniformDating user base (set U), which hyper-specializes in government workers seeking love, and you’re looking at a triple intersection H ∩ F ∩ U so small it’s practically a rounding error—maybe 0.01% of either group, tops.
Hockey forums thrive on debates about slapshot velocity and goalie save percentages, not GSA pay scales or civil service romance. You’d have better odds finding a federal employee who moonlights as a Zamboni driver than one trawling UniformDating and posting here. Give it a shot, but don’t be shocked if the only "match" you get is someone chirping your dating pitch in the penalty box!
