Idk I think it’s tough for one player to dominate against a team like the Panthers. Need your whole roster to be able to push back. Imagine him on the Panthers though? He’d have so much more space and be able to do Matthew’s things.

Toronto and the Rangers need to mimic their roster construction as best as they can.
- TC88

True but Im talking about over his career. 68 games 26 goals is not acceptable.

True but Im talking about over his career. 68 games 26 goals is not acceptable.
- Brukie

Not to disagree 100% here, but goals are much more difficult to get in the playoffs. Most goals are off broken plays and not from a set play or off a rush (yes, those happen, but not as often as in the regular season).

True but Im talking about over his career. 68 games 26 goals is not acceptable.
- Brukie

What kind of asinine math is that. A 30 goal scorer averaging a 31 goal pace in the playoffs is somehow bad. Dude you are better than that.

Oh look at that nyrangere9479 saying the same stuff he was saying last week. And the week before that. And the month before that. And last year.
- jimbro83

Oo look it’s jim contributing nothing to the blog other than being a troll once again

Oo look it’s jim contributing nothing to the blog other than being a troll once again
- nyrangers9479

It’s just weird how often you list the height and weight of grown men on here

What kind of asinine math is that. A 30 goal scorer averaging a 31 goal pace in the playoffs is somehow bad. Dude you are better than that.
- tbreinold

30 goal scorer? Im talking about Austin Matthews. He has played 68 playoff games and scored 26 goals. Matthews regular season average is 45g a season.

It’s just weird how often you list the height and weight of grown men on here
- jimbro83

Jims back, wanting to start an argument.

The guy does good research, why do you care? Does his point bother you?

30 goal scorer? Im talking about Austin Matthews. He has played 68 playoff games and scored 26 goals. Matthews regular season average is 45g a season.
- Brukie

Does anyone really believe the Leafs will shop AM? I saw an article and I just really think that was written just because someone wanted to type something.

Jims back, wanting to start an argument.

The guy does good research, why do you care? Does his point bother you?
- Brukie

It doesn’t allow him to control the narrative, blog better off without him

Does anyone really believe the Leafs will shop AM? I saw an article and I just really think that was written just because someone wanted to type something.
- mames11

Pretty sure I saw that too and it was from that hack Howard Berger that posted it.

Does anyone really believe the Leafs will shop AM? I saw an article and I just really think that was written just because someone wanted to type something.
- mames11

Never, they will not get his value back.

It doesn’t allow him to control the narrative, blog better off without him
- nyrangers9479

Narcissist tendencies

Pretty sure I saw that too and it was from that hack Howard Berger that posted it.
- lemieux_66

It was actually Jim Parsons. Not certain if that is any better of a source.

https://nhltradetalk.com/...ut-auston-matthews-trade/

Just think it's Biz's alter ego being upset and overreacting.

It was actually Jim Parsons. Not certain if that is any better of a source.

https://nhltradetalk.com/...ut-auston-matthews-trade/

Just think it's Biz's alter ego being upset and overreacting.
- mames11

Sheldon from Big Bang Theory?

Not sure it was posted:

The Sabres are "gauging the market" on Bowen Byram, per
@FriedgeHNIC

It doesn’t allow him to control the narrative, blog better off without him
- nyrangers9479[/quote gotta say NO!

[quote=nyrangers9479]It doesn’t allow him to control the narrative, blog better off without him
- Bobd62[/quote gotta say NO!

So you think

Not sure it was posted:

The Sabres are "gauging the market" on Bowen Byram, per
@FriedgeHNIC
- nyrangers2

Would definitely be down. Just don’t see the Sabres trading with us. Recall they weren’t interested in trading Eichel to the Rangers.

Would definitely be down. Just don’t see the Sabres trading with us. Recall they weren’t interested in trading Eichel to the Rangers.
- TC88

I’d imagine they’d want Emery+ in return

I’d imagine they’d want Emery+ in return
- nyrangers9479

I’d be fine with that too. Gotta give to get.

I’d imagine they’d want Emery+ in return
- nyrangers9479

Works for me

I’d imagine they’d want Emery+ in return
- nyrangers9479

It depends on if they want a D in return. A more NHL ready player would likely be what they want since they haven't made the playoffs in decades.

If a D is what they want, either Key Miller would be close to a 1-for-1 trade. Maybe Jones + pick.

If it's Emery, then I am good with that, but I just think Buffalo wants an immediate impact player. If they want more of a rebuild thing, then Emery and maybe another prospect and pick and we could also pry Tuck in the deal, as well.

It depends on if they want a D in return. A more NHL ready player would likely be what they want since they haven't made the playoffs in decades.

If a D is what they want, either Key Miller would be close to a 1-for-1 trade. Maybe Jones + pick.

If it's Emery, then I am good with that, but I just think Buffalo wants an immediate impact player. If they want more of a rebuild thing, then Emery and maybe another prospect and pick and we could also pry Tuck in the deal, as well.
- mames11

They want to trade byram because they have too many top 4 LDs. They will ask for Schneider or a young forward

They want to trade byram because they have too many top 4 LDs. They will ask for Schneider or a young forward
- picklerick

If you're the Sabres and asking for a young forward, outside of Perreault who are you requesting in the trade?

They want to trade byram because they have too many top 4 LDs. They will ask for Schneider or a young forward
- picklerick

Schneider for Byram is a very sensible trade for both teams that they won’t make. Both would immediately become #1 D, at worst 2nd pair, players for the teams