Morris
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: Hall looks disengaged, NS Joined: 07.18.2007
|
|
|
do you know what a prospect is?
1 1 10 vs. 29 nothing 22
hmm... leave it to you to argue something stupid about this.
last 3 drafts (for the most part) is what makes up a prospect... just so you don't have to google it. - dshiddy
I too thought Taylor Hall and Magnus Pajaarvi were the major cogs in that big win. |
|
dshiddy
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Canucks blogger in disguise., BC Joined: 06.23.2008
|
|
|
I'm not reading to much into that game. We did see some positives though. You are right, if the Oiler prospects would have been blown out people would be questioning our drafting. That Archibald (spelling?) Kid sure looked good for you guys. - doon
Archibald and Jensen look like good prospect. That Hanzik (goalie) kid should start figuring out if he wants to be a realtor or a stock broker. |
|
dshiddy
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Canucks blogger in disguise., BC Joined: 06.23.2008
|
|
|
I too thought Taylor Hall and Magnus Pajaarvi were the major cogs in that big win. - Morris
Oh my bad, I didn't know that game was only for first round picks. |
|
Morris
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: Hall looks disengaged, NS Joined: 07.18.2007
|
|
|
Oh my bad, I didn't know that game was only for first round picks. - dshiddy
This is what you said:
Amazing what happens when a team picks 1-5 every year plays a team that picks 20-29 every year in a prospect game.
Implying that our success here was because of our three top 10 picks in the last three years. Well two of them didn't play, so what the hell is your point? |
|
sanfordnson
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: BiggButtz Joined: 03.11.2010
|
|
|
This is what you said:
Implying that our success here was because of our three top 10 picks in the last three years. Well two of them didn't play, so what the hell is your point? - Morris
Its on top of his head. The mullet hides it. |
|
dshiddy
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Canucks blogger in disguise., BC Joined: 06.23.2008
|
|
|
This is what you said:
Implying that our success here was because of our three top 10 picks in the last three years. Well two of them didn't play, so what the hell is your point? - Morris
Every round Morris, you have 1-10 picks...
I swear some of you just argue for the sake of arguing. |
|
Morris
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: Hall looks disengaged, NS Joined: 07.18.2007
|
|
|
Every round Morris, you have 1-10 picks...
I swear some of you just argue for the sake of arguing. - dshiddy
It's often a crapshoot after the 2nd round anyways. There's often not much to draw between a 70th pick and an 80th pick.
Further, It's less about where we drafted, and more about which players are actually playing the game! The top five highest drafted oilers actually playing were selected Hopkins (1st), Pitlick (31st), Musil (31st), Lander (40th), Marincin (46th) (I didn't count Teubert because we didn't draft him and thus he's irrelevant to your argument). The top five canucks were Schroeder (22nd), Jensen (29th), Sauve (41st), Rodin (53rd) and Honzik (71st). There's a difference there, yes. But a 7-2 difference? |
|
dshiddy
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Canucks blogger in disguise., BC Joined: 06.23.2008
|
|
|
It's often a crapshoot after the 2nd round anyways. There's often not much to draw between a 70th pick and an 80th pick.
Further, It's less about where we drafted, and more about which players are actually playing the game! The top five highest drafted oilers actually playing were selected Hopkins (1st), Pitlick (31st), Musil (31st), Lander (40th), Marincin (46th) (I didn't count Teubert because we didn't draft him and thus he's irrelevant to your argument). The top five canucks were Schroeder (22nd), Jensen (29th), Sauve (41st), Rodin (53rd) and Honzik (71st). There's a difference there, yes. But a 7-2 difference? - Morris
Apparently. |
|
sanfordnson
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: BiggButtz Joined: 03.11.2010
|
|
|
It's often a crapshoot after the 2nd round anyways. There's often not much to draw between a 70th pick and an 80th pick.
Further, It's less about where we drafted, and more about which players are actually playing the game! The top five highest drafted oilers actually playing were selected Hopkins (1st), Pitlick (31st), Musil (31st), Lander (40th), Marincin (46th) (I didn't count Teubert because we didn't draft him and thus he's irrelevant to your argument). The top five canucks were Schroeder (22nd), Jensen (29th), Sauve (41st), Rodin (53rd) and Honzik (71st). There's a difference there, yes. But a 7-2 difference? - Morris
Pitlick didn't play. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Fun to watch.
why no Hodgson, I wonder. Maybe he's injured again? Or they just didn't want to embarrass him? - prock
Right back to Hodgson...the only player IN THE NHL Prock has any interest in. |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
Right back to Hodgson...the only player IN THE NHL Prock has any interest in. - boonerbuck
I was just curious. |
|
sanfordnson
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: BiggButtz Joined: 03.11.2010
|
|
|
I was just curious. - prock
|
|
nightmare3020
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Windsor Area, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
I was just curious. - prock
Thats always the excuse until the closet doors come flying off |
|
Morris
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: Hall looks disengaged, NS Joined: 07.18.2007
|
|
|
Pitlick didn't play. - sanfordnson
You're right. That actually furthers my point. The next highest drafted player would have been Hamilton (48th). The fact of the matter is you can't pin this one on the oilers high drafting as the SOLE reason that they nailed the baby nucks. |
|
sanfordnson
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: BiggButtz Joined: 03.11.2010
|
|
|
Thats always the excuse until the closet doors come flying off - nightmare3020
prock came out a while ago
real picture. true story. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
We knew it all along.... |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
We knew it all along.... - boonerbuck
Funny, seems like you've been the one slurping on your second rate prospect hodgsons bobo..... I'd figure it was more obvious with you. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Funny, seems like you've been the one slurping on your second rate prospect hodgsons bobo..... I'd figure it was more obvious with you. - prock
You just dated yourself so bad kid.
|
|
|
|
Deprecated: explode(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/includes/functions.php on line 145
Warning: Undefined array key 1 in /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/boards/desktop/thread.php on line 180
Deprecated: explode(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/includes/functions.php on line 145
Warning: Undefined array key 1 in /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/boards/desktop/thread.php on line 181
Warning: Undefined array key 2 in /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/boards/desktop/thread.php on line 181
Fatal error: Uncaught TypeError: mktime(): Argument #6 ($year) must be of type ?int, string given in /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/boards/desktop/thread.php:181
Stack trace:
#0 /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/boards/desktop/thread.php(181): mktime()
#1 /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/boards/thread.php(56): require('...')
#2 {main}
thrown in /var/www/hockeybuzz.com/boards/desktop/thread.php on line 181
| |